Was Swami Yogananda Reincarnation of William the Conqueror? I Doubt

Yes, I am talking about the famous saint Paramhansa Yogananda, who wrote “An Autobiography of a Yogi”. There is no doubt that he is one of the most famous Yogis of the modern India. I am not his follower, but I have respect for him for two purposes – (1) He spread the Vedic and Indian spirituality outside India. (2) Despite keeping the different view in some aspects, some of his writings help me in my spiritual researches and practices.

But, while searching about him, there is one thing, which has really amazed me. In one of his statements, he once said that he was the famous 11th century king “William the Conqueror” in this past birth. A book was also written named Catherine Kairavi by Two Souls: Four Lives, in which she explained about it in detail. Now, this is not only amazing, but also shocking for me.  The reason is a vast difference between the natures of William and Yogananda.

It is difficult to understand how the disciples of Yogananda try to glorify William and connect the nature of the two extremely opposite dignitaries. As a matter of the fact, William is supposed to be a cruel emperor in his time. In Wikipedia, it has been mentioned that he is also known as “William the Basted”. Rather than expending this topic, I would like to give two examples from the life of William.

William forcefully made his cousin wife

At the age of 26, William was in love with the tiny, beautiful twenty-two year old  woman named Matilda. She was the daughter of Baldwin, Count of Flanders. She dismissed his proposal of marriage. It is said that William dragged Matilda by the hair into the mud, kicked and beat her until she agreed to be his wife. But, later on, their marriage was dismissed by church because she was his cousin. Now, some who are trying to prove that William was of forgiving nature should think it again. That person couldn’t even bear the refusal of marriage proposal, then how can he be recognized as a forgiving person. Yes, there may be the incidences of his forgiveness, but if you only see some incidence than all of us can be forgiving in some instances of life.

William made agricultural land to forest for his amusement

Another fact of his life is that he changed the agricultural land to forest just for his amusement of hunting. This shows selfish motive of William.

Nothing against Yogananda and his disciples

I haven’t written this blog post for the condemnation of Yogananda or his disciples. I still respect the saint for this noble works. Even, if it is fully proved someday that Yogananda was William, then also it will not affect this respect. Because, I am prominently concerned with what he has done during this lifetime rather than the previous lifetimes. But, when I talk conceptually, the question comes in mind whether it is possible that the great saint Yoganand was the reincarnation (punarjanma) of William. Some Yogananda’s supporters try to show some positive traits of William to convince the people. Well, in this I will just say that a large number of kings in the history used to have both positive and negative traits. But, a person cannot be recognized as great unless he/she is raised above his/her selfish motives.

Eeshwar knows what the truth is. If I find something more on this topic, I will update it. If someday I read the book on the subject as mentioned above, I will post accordingly.



  1. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/I-was-William-The-Conqueror/articleshow/10301028.cms
  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_the_Conqueror
  3. http://www.travellinghistorian.com/conquer.html
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , ,

Chanakya: A Great Personality Who Makes Us Proud



Time to time, a number of dignitaries have enriched this world with their noble or revolutionary thoughts. There is no doubt that Chanakya was one of the great names in this regard. He was a great scholar, and he interfered in the Indian politics at the time of utmost need.  Magadh was under the throne of Nanda dynasty, which was supposed to be the major kingdom in the Bharatvarhsa (India). This dynasty was ravaging the nation. It was under the king who was sunk in his luxuries and he didn’t care even when Bharatvarsha was being attacked by invaders. When Chanakya tried to awake the king, the king insulted him badly. So, Chanakya opened his ponytail and took the oath that he would not tie it until he would destroy the Nanda dynasty. He became the master (guru) of a genius child named Chandragupta Maurya. When he grew up, Chanakya and Chandragupta started the mission against Nanda with taking the independent republics inside India as well as some other supporters with them. Finally, they succeeded and Chandragupta became the emperor of Akhand Bhaarat (united India).

During that era, the situation of India was somewhat like that it is in the present scenario. Kings were busy in their political gain. The common man was being ravaged by the kings. People were suffering the cruelty. At that time, Chanakya gave a strong and a noble king to India. He used the method “by hook, or by crook”, but these methods were just for sake of good of the public.

Unfortunately, today also there are some people in India, who are directly or indirectly supporting the cruel Nand dynasty. Interestingly, some of these Nanda supporters are recognized as the scholars by some communities. For instance, I have read in an article of some Sardar Baldev Singh, who is perhaps known as a Sikh scholar, that Hindus attack Sikh tenets because of their shame for the acts of Krishna and Chanakya, who used the bad means for pursuit of Victory. Now, even a child is able to imagine how laughable sentence it is. Today also, Chanakya and Krishna are the role models of not only the true Hindus, but also the true Indians. Whatever they did, was for discarding the cruelty from the nation, and not for the pursuit of Victory. And their hook and crook method was for the wicked people, not for everyone. If they had not destroy the wicked people, what would have happened to the common man, it can be easily imagined. Krishna’s Bhagwat Gita and Chankaya’s Arthshastra are still marked as some of the most liked treatises of the world.

Jains claimed Chanakya as a follower of Jainism in their Puranas (mythological scriptures). But, I don’t think that he had anything to do with Jainism. I don’t think that his books have any mention of Jainism. A large number of his tenets are based on the ancient Vedic texts.

Salute to that great personality of history from the core of heart!!!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment